People v. Landy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Landy

112 A.D.3d 992, 975 N.Y.S.2d 921

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 5, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D.3d 992 (People v. Landy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Landy, 112 A.D.3d 992, 975 N.Y.S.2d 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), rendered December 2, 2011 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted burglary in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of attempted burglary in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. In accordance with the plea agreement, he was sentenced as a second felony offender to five years in prison followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals. Defendant’s sole claim on appeal, that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive, is foreclosed by his valid waiver of the right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see People v Marshall, 108 AD3d 884, 884 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 957 [Oct. 30, 2013]; People v Seuffert, 104 AD3d 1021, 1022 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1009 [2013]).

Stein, J.E, Spain, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), rendered December 2, 2011 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted burglary in the second degree.

In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of attempted burglary in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. In accordance with the plea agreement, he was sentenced as a second felony offender to five years in prison followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals. Defendant’s sole claim on appeal, that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive, is foreclosed by his valid waiver of the right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see People v Marshall, 108 AD3d 884, 884 [2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 957 [Oct. 30, 2013]; People v Seuffert, 104 AD3d 1021, 1022 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1009 [2013]).

Stein, J.E, Spain, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.3d 992, 975 N.Y.S.2d 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-landy-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack