People v. Lamberty

45 A.D.3d 486, 845 N.Y.S.2d 740
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 29, 2007·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Megan Tallmer, J.), entered on or about March 17, 2006, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender and sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant received effective assistance of counsel at his classification hearing. It is undisputed that the court correctly assessed 150 points, which is well over the threshold for a level three adjudication. Even if we were to find that counsel’s downward departure argument inappropriately failed to address relevant factors, we would find that defendant was not prejudiced in any manner, since there is no indication that any special circumstances existed that would warrant such a departure (see People v Douglas, 18 AD3d 967, 968 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 710 [2005]; see also People v Guaman, 8 AD3d 545 [2004]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Nardelli, Buckley, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lamberty, 45 A.D.3d 486, 845 N.Y.S.2d 740 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

45 A.D.3d 486 (People v. Lamberty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Iorio
74 A.D.3d 1306 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Austin
54 A.D.3d 916 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)