People v. Lamb
Opinion
| People v Lamb |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 06258 |
| Decided on December 6, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on December 6, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
BETSY BARROS, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
ROBERT J. MILLER
PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.
2014-00036
(Ind. No. 1591/11)
v
Jermaine Lamb, appellant.
Jermaine Lamb, Ossining, NY, appellant pro se.
Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (Johnnette Traill, Sharon Y. Brodt, and Roni C. Piplani of counsel), for respondent.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Tammy E. Linn of counsel), former appellate counsel.
DECISION & ORDER
Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated September 26, 2018 (People v Lamb, 164 AD3d 1470), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 11, 2013, as amended September 19, 2013.
ORDERED that the application is denied.
The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745; People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277).
BARROS, J.P., CHAMBERS, MILLER and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:Darrell M. Joseph
Acting Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
198 N.Y.S.3d 782 (People v. Lamb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.