People v. Lamarre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lamarre

215 A.D.2d 694, 628 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5425

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 22, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 215 A.D.2d 694 (People v. Lamarre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lamarre, 215 A.D.2d 694, 628 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered May 2, 1990, convicting him of rape in the second degree, sexual abuse in the second degree, sexual abuse in the third degree and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Thompson and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered May 2, 1990, convicting him of rape in the second degree, sexual abuse in the second degree, sexual abuse in the third degree and endangering the welfare of a child (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, Thompson and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

215 A.D.2d 694, 628 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lamarre-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack