People v. Lall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lall

284 A.D.2d 483, 726 N.Y.S.2d 868, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6325

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lall. Read the opinion of the Court — 293 A.D.2d 689 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 18, 2001·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.), rendered December 17, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[484]*484Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly admitted limited expert testimony concerning the general practices of drug dealers (see, People v Smalls, 266 AD2d 570; People v Kane, 207 AD2d 846, affd sub nom. People v Graves, 85 NY2d 1024). Santucci, J. P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.), rendered December 17, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[484]*484Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly admitted limited expert testimony concerning the general practices of drug dealers (see, People v Smalls, 266 AD2d 570; People v Kane, 207 AD2d 846, affd sub nom. People v Graves, 85 NY2d 1024). Santucci, J. P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.

People v. Lall, 284 A.D.2d 483, 726 N.Y.S.2d 868, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6325 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

284 A.D.2d 483 (People v. Lall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related