People v. Lake

193 A.D.2d 698, 598 N.Y.S.2d 973
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Lake. Read the opinion of the Court — 213 A.D.2d 494

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), rendered May 31, 1991, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

We find that the sentence imposed is not unduly harsh or excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Lake, 193 A.D.2d 698, 598 N.Y.S.2d 973 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

193 A.D.2d 698 (People v. Lake) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)