Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Lake

People v. Lake

199 N.E.2d 847, 14 N.Y.2d 790, 250 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1090
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 4, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 N.E.2d 847 (People v. Lake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Lake, 199 N.E.2d 847, 14 N.Y.2d 790, 250 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1090 (N.Y. 1964).

Opinion

Order reversed and a hearing directed. The factual allegations of coercion by the Judge and District Attorney leading to a plea of guilty are not traversed by the District Attorney and are sufficient on their face to require a hearing (People v. Picciotti, 4 N Y 2d 340; People v. Guariglia, 303 N. Y. 338; People v. Pearson, 12 N Y 2d 978).

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Burke and Bergan. Judges Van Voorhis and Scileppi dissent and vote to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Glasper
200 N.E.2d 776 (New York Court of Appeals, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 N.E.2d 847, 14 N.Y.2d 790, 250 N.Y.S.2d 816, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lake-ny-1964.