People v. Laing

168 A.D.2d 635
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 24, 1990·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Linakis, J.), dated March 23, 1990, which denied their application to allow a witness to provide identification testimony despite the lack of a notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 with respect to that witness.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

"As a rule, no appeal lies from an order arising out of a criminal proceeding absent specific statutory authorization” (People v Santos, 64 NY2d 702, 704). CPL 450.20 (8) permits an appeal by the People only when suppression is granted under CPL 710.20, and that was not the basis for the preclusion in this case. Since there is no statutory authorization for the instant appeal, it must be dismissed. Eiber, J. P., Sullivan, Balletta and O’Brien, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Laing, 168 A.D.2d 635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

168 A.D.2d 635 (People v. Laing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Laing
79 N.Y.2d 166 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Paris
150 Misc. 2d 266 (New York Supreme Court, 1991)
People v. Wade
170 A.D.2d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)