People v. Lahara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Lahara

222 A.D.2d 700, 636 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13867

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 222 A.D.2d 700 (People v. Lahara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Lahara, 222 A.D.2d 700, 636 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered March 25, 1993, convicting her of murder in the second degree and manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support her conviction of felony murder as there was insufficient evidence of the underlying felony of robbery of attempted robbery. This contention is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Davis, 182 AD2d 771). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered March 25, 1993, convicting her of murder in the second degree and manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support her conviction of felony murder as there was insufficient evidence of the underlying felony of robbery of attempted robbery. This contention is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Davis, 182 AD2d 771). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Balletta, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 A.D.2d 700, 636 N.Y.S.2d 657, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lahara-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack