People v. LaFantana
This text of 277 A.D.2d 395 (People v. LaFantana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered April 27, 1999, convicting him of criminally negligent homicide, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the People failed to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he acted with the requisite culpable mental state to support a conviction of criminally negligent homicide. Viewing the evidence adduced at trial in [396]*396the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the conviction. While operating a vehicle at excessive speed is not in itself sufficient to prove criminal negligence (see, People v Paris, 138 AD2d 534), the People proved that the defendant’s actions were a gross deviation from the ordinary standard of care (see, People v Ricardo B., 73 NY2d 228; People v Soto, 44 NY2d 683; see generally, People v Senisi, 196 AD2d 376). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). O’Brien, J. P., Thompson, S. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
277 A.D.2d 395, 716 N.Y.S.2d 882, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lafantana-nyappdiv-2000.