People v. Lacona
44 Misc. 2d 573
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 18, 1964·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Under the circumstances here disclosed, the assignment of counsel was an imphovident exercise of discretion since defendant was thereby deprived of the services of counsel theretofore retained by him. (People v. Gordon, 262 App. Div. 534.)
The judgment of conviction should be unanimously reversed on the law and case remanded for repleading and a new trial.
Concur — Hart, S oh wartzwald- and Ritchie, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Lacona, 44 Misc. 2d 573 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).
44 Misc. 2d 573 (People v. Lacona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Arroyave
401 N.E.2d 393 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)