People v. Lacona
This text of 44 Misc. 2d 573 (People v. Lacona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the circumstances here disclosed, the assignment of counsel was an imphovident exercise of discretion since defendant was thereby deprived of the services of counsel theretofore retained by him. (People v. Gordon, 262 App. Div. 534.)
The judgment of conviction should be unanimously reversed on the law and case remanded for repleading and a new trial.
Concur — Hart, S oh wartzwald- and Ritchie, JJ.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 Misc. 2d 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-lacona-nyappterm-1964.