People v. Laboy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Laboy

44 A.D.2d 518, 353 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5508

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 12, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 44 A.D.2d 518 (People v. Laboy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Laboy, 44 A.D.2d 518, 353 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5508 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered December 8, 1972, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the third degree and sentencing him to a State reformatory, unanimously reversed, on the law, as a matter of discretion and in the interest of justice, the sentence vacated, and the case remanded for resentence in accordance with the promise made. On the record before us it clearly appears that an inducement for defendant’s plea was the promise of a sentence which would not exceed three years. The sentence imposed, however, may require appellant’s incarceration for a period of four years. (Penal Law, §§ 75.00, 75.10.) Since this was not in accord with the plea bargain, the matter must be returned for fulfillment of the sentence promise. (Santobello v. New York, 404 U. S. 257; People v. Griffith, 43 A D 2d 20.) Concur — Nunez, J. P., Kupferman, Murphy, Tilzer and Moore, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered December 8, 1972, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the third degree and sentencing him to a State reformatory, unanimously reversed, on the law, as a matter of discretion and in the interest of justice, the sentence vacated, and the case remanded for resentence in accordance with the promise made. On the record before us it clearly appears that an inducement for defendant’s plea was the promise of a sentence which would not exceed three years. The sentence imposed, however, may require appellant’s incarceration for a period of four years. (Penal Law, §§ 75.00, 75.10.) Since this was not in accord with the plea bargain, the matter must be returned for fulfillment of the sentence promise. (Santobello v. New York, 404 U. S. 257; People v. Griffith, 43 A D 2d 20.) Concur — Nunez, J. P., Kupferman, Murphy, Tilzer and Moore, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D.2d 518, 353 N.Y.S.2d 193, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-laboy-nyappdiv-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack