People v. Labenski

156 A.D.2d 1003, 550 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16206
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Labenski. Read the opinion of the Court — 134 A.D.2d 907

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s challenge to the propriety of trial testimony that the victims had seen defendant at an earlier hearing. Reliance on People v Annis (48 AD2d 622) is misplaced because CPL 60.30 has since been amended to eliminate its rationale (see, Bellacosa, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 11 A, CPL 60.30, at 511-512). We have examined the other issues raised by defendant and they also lack merit. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Gorman, J.— assault, first degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Boomer, Green, Pine and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Labenski, 156 A.D.2d 1003, 550 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

156 A.D.2d 1003 (People v. Labenski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Annis
48 A.D.2d 622 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)