People v. Labare

157 N.Y.S.3d 794, 201 A.D.3d 1254, 2022 NY Slip Op 00474
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 27, 2022
Docket111129
StatusPublished

This text of 157 N.Y.S.3d 794 (People v. Labare) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Labare, 157 N.Y.S.3d 794, 201 A.D.3d 1254, 2022 NY Slip Op 00474 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

People v Labare (2022 NY Slip Op 00474)
People v Labare
2022 NY Slip Op 00474
Decided on January 27, 2022
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered:January 27, 2022

111129

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Sonya L. Labare, Appellant.


Calendar Date:December 30, 2021
Before:Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Aarons, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ.

Lisa A. Burgess, Indian Lake, for appellant.

Craig P. Carriero, District Attorney, Malone (Jennifer M. Hollis of counsel), for respondent.



Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin County (Main Jr., J.), rendered December 17, 2018, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to burglary in the second degree and waived her right to appeal. County Court sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to a prison term of five years, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision, with the sentence to run concurrently with the sentence that defendant was already serving. Defendant appeals.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of her assignment of representing defendant on the basis that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel's brief, we agree. Consequently, the judgment is affirmed and counsel's request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Beaty, 22 NY3d 490 [2014]; People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Aarons, Pritzker and Colangelo, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Beaty
5 N.E.3d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 N.Y.S.3d 794, 201 A.D.3d 1254, 2022 NY Slip Op 00474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-labare-nyappdiv-2022.