People v. La Salle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. La Salle

2 A.D.2d 713, 153 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4879

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 713 (People v. La Salle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. La Salle, 2 A.D.2d 713, 153 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Appellant was convicted in the County Court, Kings County, as charged in an indictment for burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the second degree. Appellant admitted that he was the person mentioned in an information filed by the District Attorney charging him with two prior felony convictions. He was sentenced to serve from 15 to 20 years on the burglary charge and from 9 to 10 years on the larceny charge, such terms to run concurrently. The appeal is from the judgment and the sentence. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opiMon. No separate appeal lies from the sentence, which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant was convicted in the County Court, Kings County, as charged in an indictment for burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the second degree. Appellant admitted that he was the person mentioned in an information filed by the District Attorney charging him with two prior felony convictions. He was sentenced to serve from 15 to 20 years on the burglary charge and from 9 to 10 years on the larceny charge, such terms to run concurrently. The appeal is from the judgment and the sentence. Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opiMon. No separate appeal lies from the sentence, which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 713, 153 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-la-salle-nyappdiv-1956.