People v. La Rocque

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. La Rocque

82 A.D.2d 867, 441 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14556

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 82 A.D.2d 867 (People v. La Rocque) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. La Rocque, 82 A.D.2d 867, 441 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14556 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from four sentences of the County Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), all imposed June 2, 1980, upon his convictions of robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and robbery in the third degree (two counts), upon his pleas of guilty, the sentences being concurrent terms of imprisonment of 3 to 9 years, 2 to 6 years, and IV2 to 4V2 years, respectively. Sentences modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence imposed on the conviction of robbery in the first degree to a term of imprisonment of 2 to 6 years. As so modified, sentences affirmed. The sentence imposed upon the conviction of robbery in the first degree was excessive to the extent indicated. Titone, J.P., Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Thompson, J., concurs as to the affirmance of the sentences imposed upon the convictions of attempted robbery in the first degree and robbery in the third degree, but otherwise dissents and votes to affirm the sentence imposed upon the conviction of robbery in the first degree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from four sentences of the County Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), all imposed June 2, 1980, upon his convictions of robbery in the first degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and robbery in the third degree (two counts), upon his pleas of guilty, the sentences being concurrent terms of imprisonment of 3 to 9 years, 2 to 6 years, and IV2 to 4V2 years, respectively. Sentences modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence imposed on the conviction of robbery in the first degree to a term of imprisonment of 2 to 6 years. As so modified, sentences affirmed. The sentence imposed upon the conviction of robbery in the first degree was excessive to the extent indicated. Titone, J.P., Gulotta and Margett, JJ., concur.

Thompson, J., concurs as to the affirmance of the sentences imposed upon the convictions of attempted robbery in the first degree and robbery in the third degree, but otherwise dissents and votes to affirm the sentence imposed upon the conviction of robbery in the first degree.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A.D.2d 867, 441 N.Y.S.2d 427, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-la-rocque-nyappdiv-1981.