Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. La Mar

People v. La Mar

116 A.D.2d 1003, 498 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51780
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 24, 1986
StatusPublished

This text of 116 A.D.2d 1003 (People v. La Mar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. La Mar, 116 A.D.2d 1003, 498 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51780 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although the trial court exceeded the bounds of permissible questioning of defendant’s witnesses (see, People v Mees, 47 NY2d 997, 998; People v Mendes, 3 NY2d 120, 121), defense counsel failed to preserve this issue for our review as a matter of law (see, People v Charleston, 56 NY2d 886). Nor did he preserve for such review any error committed by the sentencing court (see, People v Green, 54 NY2d 878). On this record, we decline to exercise our discretion either to reverse the conviction or to remand for resentencing. (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J. — burglary, second degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Mendes
143 N.E.2d 806 (New York Court of Appeals, 1957)
People v. Mees
394 N.E.2d 283 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Green
429 N.E.2d 415 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Charleston
438 N.E.2d 1114 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 A.D.2d 1003, 498 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-la-mar-nyappdiv-1986.