People v. La Manga Development Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. La Manga Development Corp.

70 A.D.2d 541, 416 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11912

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 541 (People v. La Manga Development Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. La Manga Development Corp., 70 A.D.2d 541, 416 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 12, 1978, which granted a motion for summary judgment made by plaintiff-respondent permanently enjoining defendant-appellants from any business involving securities, ordered offer of restitution of moneys paid by prospective purchasers of condominium interests in realty and awarded costs of $2,000, modified, on the law, to direct a hearing on the issue of the amount of restitution, limit the restitution liability of the defendant-appellant Ross to pre-July, 1972 purchasers of condominium units at the Euromanga development, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. A hearing is necessary to avoid possible unjust enrichment of the condominium purchasers (People v Barrera, 63 AD2d 873; see, also, 50 NY Jur, Restitution, § 72). The complaint and the uncontroverted proof limited Ross’ involvement to the Euromanga development. The complaint limited his involvement up to November, 1972 but the proof, uncontradicted by any competent evidence, does not show him involved after June, 1972. Concur—Lane, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman and Lynch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 12, 1978, which granted a motion for summary judgment made by plaintiff-respondent permanently enjoining defendant-appellants from any business involving securities, ordered offer of restitution of moneys paid by prospective purchasers of condominium interests in realty and awarded costs of $2,000, modified, on the law, to direct a hearing on the issue of the amount of restitution, limit the restitution liability of the defendant-appellant Ross to pre-July, 1972 purchasers of condominium units at the Euromanga development, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. A hearing is necessary to avoid possible unjust enrichment of the condominium purchasers (People v Barrera, 63 AD2d 873; see, also, 50 NY Jur, Restitution, § 72). The complaint and the uncontroverted proof limited Ross’ involvement to the Euromanga development. The complaint limited his involvement up to November, 1972 but the proof, uncontradicted by any competent evidence, does not show him involved after June, 1972. Concur—Lane, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman and Lynch, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 541, 416 N.Y.S.2d 278, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-la-manga-development-corp-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack