People v. Kwok

258 A.D.2d 402, 682 N.Y.S.2d 577
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Kwok. Read the opinion of the Court — 257 A.D.2d 402

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin Weissberg, J.), rendered June 25, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 33/4 to 7V2 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim regarding the factual sufficiency of the indictment is waived by his guilty plea and is unpreserved (see, People v Iannone, 45 NY2d 589, 600-601). His claim regarding the factual sufficiency of his allocution is unpreserved since he failed to object at sentencing and did not move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction (People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725; People v Teddy, 227 AD2d 182). Defendant’s allocution, in which he acknowledged every element of the crime, did not cast significant doubt on his guilt.

We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Williams and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kwok, 258 A.D.2d 402, 682 N.Y.S.2d 577 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

258 A.D.2d 402 (People v. Kwok) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Toxey
655 N.E.2d 160 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Iannone
384 N.E.2d 656 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Teddy
227 A.D.2d 182 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)