People v. Kvalheim
This text of 214 N.E.2d 789 (People v. Kvalheim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed. Dismissal of the complaint (instead of remission for a new arraignment) was proper here since defendant had already served his sentence of imprisonment (People v. Witenski, 15 N Y 2d 392). Since appellant appeals from that part only of the order which dismisses the complaint we make no determination as to the correctness of so much of the Appellate Term decision as holds that defendant was not properly informed of his rights.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Vooehis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
214 N.E.2d 789, 17 N.Y.2d 510, 267 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kvalheim-ny-1966.