People v. Kvalheim

214 N.E.2d 789, 17 N.Y.2d 510, 267 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1611
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 20, 1966·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed. Dismissal of the complaint (instead of remission for a new arraignment) was proper here since defendant had already served his sentence of imprisonment (People v. Witenski, 15 N Y 2d 392). Since appellant appeals from that part only of the order which dismisses the complaint we make no determination as to the correctness of so much of the Appellate Term decision as holds that defendant was not properly informed of his rights.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Fuld, Van Vooehis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kvalheim, 214 N.E.2d 789, 17 N.Y.2d 510, 267 N.Y.S.2d 512, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1611 (N.Y. 1966).

214 N.E.2d 789 (People v. Kvalheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sabino (Shaday)
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016
People v. Stewart
57 A.D.3d 1312 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
In re Ernesto M.
65 A.D.2d 800 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
People v. Barnes
58 A.D.2d 608 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
People v. Allen
352 N.E.2d 591 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Harrison
51 A.D.2d 589 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)