People v. Kuyal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kuyal

100 A.D.2d 736, 473 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17734

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 6, 1984·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment of conviction for armed robbery, the only error assigned pertains to the victim’s testimony on the People’s direct case concerning her prior photographic identification of defendant. Because there was no objection to the testimony, the error was not preserved for our review (CPL 470.05, subd 2), and we see no basis for reaching the issue in the interests of justice. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boomer, J. — robbery, second degree.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, O’Donnell, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment of conviction for armed robbery, the only error assigned pertains to the victim’s testimony on the People’s direct case concerning her prior photographic identification of defendant. Because there was no objection to the testimony, the error was not preserved for our review (CPL 470.05, subd 2), and we see no basis for reaching the issue in the interests of justice. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boomer, J. — robbery, second degree.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, O’Donnell, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

People v. Kuyal, 100 A.D.2d 736, 473 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

100 A.D.2d 736 (People v. Kuyal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related