People v. Kuyal

100 A.D.2d 736, 473 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17734
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 6, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 A.D.2d 736 (People v. Kuyal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kuyal, 100 A.D.2d 736, 473 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment of conviction for armed robbery, the only error assigned pertains to the victim’s testimony on the People’s direct case concerning her prior photographic identification of defendant. Because there was no objection to the testimony, the error was not preserved for our review (CPL 470.05, subd 2), and we see no basis for reaching the issue in the interests of justice. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boomer, J. — robbery, second degree.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, O’Donnell, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Martinez
237 A.D.2d 942 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 A.D.2d 736, 473 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kuyal-nyappdiv-1984.