People v. Kuo Ping

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kuo Ping

207 A.D.2d 262, 615 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8147

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 4, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 207 A.D.2d 262 (People v. Kuo Ping) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kuo Ping, 207 A.D.2d 262, 615 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered June 18, 1992,. convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree and sentencing him to a term of 18 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

[263]*263Since defendant never moved before the trial court to withdraw his plea (CPL 220.60) or to vacate the judgment of conviction (CPL 440.10), he has not preserved for appellate review the issue of the voluntariness of his plea (People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662), and we decline to consider it in the interest of justice. Were we to consider this issue, we would deem it to be without merit since an examination of the record indicates that defendant’s guilty plea was voluntarily and knowingly entered. We find no abuse of discretion in the sentence imposed. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered June 18, 1992,. convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree and sentencing him to a term of 18 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

[263]*263Since defendant never moved before the trial court to withdraw his plea (CPL 220.60) or to vacate the judgment of conviction (CPL 440.10), he has not preserved for appellate review the issue of the voluntariness of his plea (People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662), and we decline to consider it in the interest of justice. Were we to consider this issue, we would deem it to be without merit since an examination of the record indicates that defendant’s guilty plea was voluntarily and knowingly entered. We find no abuse of discretion in the sentence imposed. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Rubin and Tom, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 262, 615 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kuo-ping-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack