People v. Kunz

98 N.E.2d 493, 302 N.Y. 704, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 871
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Kunz. Read the opinion of the Court — 300 N.Y. 273
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 9, 1951·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument, or, in the alternative, to amend the remittitur granted to the extent that we recall our remittitur, and when returned, amend it so as to reverse the judgment, and order the fine remitted and the information dismissed. [See 300 N. Y. 273.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kunz, 98 N.E.2d 493, 302 N.Y. 704, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 871 (N.Y. 1951).

98 N.E.2d 493 (People v. Kunz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kunz
90 N.E.2d 455 (New York Court of Appeals, 1949)