People v. Kuczka

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Kuczka

194 N.W.2d 527, 37 Mich. App. 298

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 30, 1971

DocketDocket No. 11128

StatusPublished

This text of 194 N.W.2d 527 (People v. Kuczka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kuczka, 194 N.W.2d 527, 37 Mich. App. 298 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was tried and convicted of breaking and entering an office building with intent to commit a larceny therein and he appeals. A motion to affirm has been filed by the people.

Upon an examination of the briefs and records it is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was tried and convicted of breaking and entering an office building with intent to commit a larceny therein and he appeals. A motion to affirm has been filed by the people.

Upon an examination of the briefs and records it is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 N.W.2d 527, 37 Mich. App. 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kuczka-michctapp-1971.