People v. Kuczka

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Kuczka

194 N.W.2d 527, 37 Mich. App. 298

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided November 30, 1971·No. Docket No. 11128·Published

Opinion

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was tried and convicted of breaking and entering an office building with intent to commit a larceny therein and he appeals. A motion to affirm has been filed by the people.

Upon an examination of the briefs and records it is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was tried and convicted of breaking and entering an office building with intent to commit a larceny therein and he appeals. A motion to affirm has been filed by the people.

Upon an examination of the briefs and records it is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm is granted.

People v. Kuczka, 194 N.W.2d 527, 37 Mich. App. 298 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

194 N.W.2d 527 (People v. Kuczka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.