People v. Kubasiak

156 A.D.2d 932, 550 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16075
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 20, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court properly sentenced defendant as a second felony offender without conducting an evidentiary hearing because defendant failed to allege facts in support of his statement that his predicate felony conviction was unconstitutionally obtained (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 15; see also, CPL 400.21 [7] [b]; People v Gipson, 152 AD2d 941). Moreover, the court properly questioned defendant regarding his claim and concluded that he had failed to sustain his burden of proof on the issue (see, People v Harris, supra, at 15, 16; People v Stewart, 96 AD2d 622, 623). Defendant’s contention that the trial court abused its discretion in its Sandoval (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) ruling and thereby deprived him of a fair trial lacks merit (see, People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292; People v Bennette, 56 NY2d 142; People v Shields, 46 NY2d 764). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme [933]*933Court, Erie County, Flynn, J. — burglary, third degree.) Present —Callahan, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kubasiak, 156 A.D.2d 932, 550 N.Y.S.2d 861, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16075 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

156 A.D.2d 932 (People v. Kubasiak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Johnson
177 A.D.2d 791 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)