People v. Kruger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kruger

125 A.D.2d 495, 509 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62800

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 125 A.D.2d 495 (People v. Kruger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kruger, 125 A.D.2d 495, 509 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the County Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), imposed April 2, 1985, upon his conviction of unlawful dealing in hazardous wastes in the second degree, after a plea of guilty, the sentence being a term of probation of three years on condition that the defendant perform 150 hours of community service, and a $10,000 fine.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

That portion of the sentence which provided for a fine of $10,000 was lawfully imposed in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL 71-2715 [2]; 71-2721 [3]). Moreover, the sentence was in accordance with the promise made at the time of the bargained-for plea (see, People v La Lande, 104 AD2d 1052). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the County Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), imposed April 2, 1985, upon his conviction of unlawful dealing in hazardous wastes in the second degree, after a plea of guilty, the sentence being a term of probation of three years on condition that the defendant perform 150 hours of community service, and a $10,000 fine.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

That portion of the sentence which provided for a fine of $10,000 was lawfully imposed in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL 71-2715 [2]; 71-2721 [3]). Moreover, the sentence was in accordance with the promise made at the time of the bargained-for plea (see, People v La Lande, 104 AD2d 1052). Mangano, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 A.D.2d 495, 509 N.Y.S.2d 582, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kruger-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack