People v. Kropp
This text of 49 A.D.3d 1339 (People v. Kropp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[1340]*1340Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of felony driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [3]; § 1193 [1] [c] [former (ii)]) and aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the third degree (§ 511 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the bargained-for sentence of incarceration imposed by County Court is not unduly harsh or severe. “We are constrained, however, to vacate the sentence” imposed for aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the third degree (People v John, 288 AD2d 848, 850 [2001], lv denied 97 NY2d 705 [2002]; see People v Figueroa, 17 AD3d 1130, 1131 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 788 [2005]; People v Fehr, 303 AD2d 1039, 1040 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 538 [2003]). The comments of the court in imposing a $200 fine with respect to that offense reflect “ ‘the court’s misapprehension that it had no ability to exercise its discretion’ in determining whether to impose a fine” (John, 288 AD2d at 850). We therefore modify the judgment accordingly, and we remit the matter to County Court for resentencing on that offense. Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Smith, Green and Gorski, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 A.D.3d 1339, 854 N.Y.2d 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kropp-nyappdiv-2008.