People v. Kroop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kroop

96 A.D.2d 1103, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19761

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 96 A.D.2d 1103 (People v. Kroop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kroop, 96 A.D.2d 1103, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19761 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), imposed August 17,1982, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, after a plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment of one and two-thirds to five years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to five years’ probation. As so modified, sentence affirmed, and case remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, to fix the terms and conditions of probation. The sentence is excessive to the extent indicated herein. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Harrington, J.), imposed August 17,1982, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, after a plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment of one and two-thirds to five years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to five years’ probation. As so modified, sentence affirmed, and case remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, to fix the terms and conditions of probation. The sentence is excessive to the extent indicated herein. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 A.D.2d 1103, 466 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kroop-nyappdiv-1983.