People v. Kronick

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Kronick

126 N.E.2d 307, 308 N.Y. 866, 1955 N.Y. LEXIS 1115

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 11, 1955

StatusPublished

Cited by17 cases

This text of 126 N.E.2d 307 (People v. Kronick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kronick, 126 N.E.2d 307, 308 N.Y. 866, 1955 N.Y. LEXIS 1115 (N.Y. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders reversed and matter remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, with direction to vacate and set aside the sentence imposed upon defendant as a fourth felony offender by that court on May 29, 1950, and to dismiss as a basis for multiple offender treatment previous convictions had in the State of Maryland in 1933 for violations of the Code of Public General Laws, 1924 (art. 27, § 36), and in the State of Delaware in 1938 for violation of chapter 150 of the Revised Code of Delaware, 1935 (§ 5192), and to resentence the defendant as a second felony offender (Penal Law, § 1941). It appears that the crimes for which those convictions were had, as defined by the respective statutes of those States, would not be felonies if [869]*869committed in New York (Penal Law, §§ 402, 403, 404, 405; People ex rel. Marsh v. Martin, 284 App. Div. 156, affd. 308 N. Y. 823; People v. Olah, 300 N. Y. 96). No opinion.

Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders reversed and matter remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, with direction to vacate and set aside the sentence imposed upon defendant as a fourth felony offender by that court on May 29, 1950, and to dismiss as a basis for multiple offender treatment previous convictions had in the State of Maryland in 1933 for violations of the Code of Public General Laws, 1924 (art. 27, § 36), and in the State of Delaware in 1938 for violation of chapter 150 of the Revised Code of Delaware, 1935 (§ 5192), and to resentence the defendant as a second felony offender (Penal Law, § 1941). It appears that the crimes for which those convictions were had, as defined by the respective statutes of those States, would not be felonies if [869]*869committed in New York (Penal Law, §§ 402, 403, 404, 405; People ex rel. Marsh v. Martin, 284 App. Div. 156, affd. 308 N. Y. 823; People v. Olah, 300 N. Y. 96). No opinion.

Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 N.E.2d 307, 308 N.Y. 866, 1955 N.Y. LEXIS 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kronick-ny-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack