People v. Krocke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Krocke

265 A.D.2d 879, 696 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9985

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 265 A.D.2d 879 (People v. Krocke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Krocke, 265 A.D.2d 879, 696 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: County Court erred in sentencing defendant to consecutive terms of imprisonment upon his conviction of two counts of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (Penal Law § 165.50). The two counts of the indictment charge defendant with only a single act of possession {see, People v Taylor, 197 AD2d 858, 859; see also, People v Cleveland, 236 AD2d 802, Iv denied 89 NY2d 1033). We therefore modify the judgment by directing that the terms of imprisonment run concurrently. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Criminal Possession Stolen Property, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: County Court erred in sentencing defendant to consecutive terms of imprisonment upon his conviction of two counts of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (Penal Law § 165.50). The two counts of the indictment charge defendant with only a single act of possession {see, People v Taylor, 197 AD2d 858, 859; see also, People v Cleveland, 236 AD2d 802, Iv denied 89 NY2d 1033). We therefore modify the judgment by directing that the terms of imprisonment run concurrently. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Henry, Jr., J. — Criminal Possession Stolen Property, 3rd Degree.) Present — Pine, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Balio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 A.D.2d 879, 696 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-krocke-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack