People v. Krawchuk

236 A.D. 736

This text of 236 A.D. 736 (People v. Krawchuk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Krawchuk, 236 A.D. 736 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Judgment of conviction of the County Court of Rockland county reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial of the indictment ordered in the Supreme Court to which the trial of the indictment is transferred. The court committed error in its charge to the jury, particularly on the subject of circumstantial evidence and reasonable doubt, and in what may have been inadvertent statements respecting the rights of the defendant. Upon a new trial a more orderly presentation of the evidence no doubt can be had than was had on this trial. On such a trial the rule stated in People v. Hinksman (192 N. Y. 421) and kindred cases should be observed in passing upon the admissibility of parts of the defendant’s statement which was admitted in its entirety despite the defendant’s not being a witness on the trial. Other alleged errors need not be adverted to as the basis for them may not appear on a new trial. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and. Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. . Hinksman
85 N.E. 676 (New York Court of Appeals, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.D. 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-krawchuk-nyappdiv-1932.