People v. Kraus
This text of 66 A.D.3d 854 (People v. Kraus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), dated April 9, 2008, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in declining to downwardly depart from the defendant’s presumptive risk level inasmuch as there was no clear and convincing evidence in the record of a mitigating factor “of a kind' or to a degree, not otherwise adequately taken into account by the guidelines” (Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [2006]; see People v Burgos, 39 AD3d 520 [2007]; cf. People v Agard, 35 AD3d 568 [2006]). Fisher, J.P., Covello, Angiolillo and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 A.D.3d 854, 886 N.Y.S.2d 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kraus-nyappdiv-2009.