People v. Kraus

66 A.D.3d 854, 886 N.Y.S.2d 621
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 20, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 66 A.D.3d 854 (People v. Kraus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kraus, 66 A.D.3d 854, 886 N.Y.S.2d 621 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.), dated April 9, 2008, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in declining to downwardly depart from the defendant’s presumptive risk level inasmuch as there was no clear and convincing evidence in the record of a mitigating factor “of a kind' or to a degree, not otherwise adequately taken into account by the guidelines” (Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 4 [2006]; see People v Burgos, 39 AD3d 520 [2007]; cf. People v Agard, 35 AD3d 568 [2006]). Fisher, J.P., Covello, Angiolillo and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Cruz
74 A.D.3d 1305 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Burch
73 A.D.3d 1145 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 A.D.3d 854, 886 N.Y.S.2d 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kraus-nyappdiv-2009.