People v. Kramer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kramer

56 A.D.2d 853, 391 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11199

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 7, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 56 A.D.2d 853 (People v. Kramer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kramer, 56 A.D.2d 853, 391 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11199 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered June 9, 1975, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment with a minimum of three years and six months and a maximum of seven years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a term of imprisonment with a minimum of two years and a maximum of four years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Upon the People’s representation that there was a promise made as to sentence, we find the sentence to be excessive to the extent indicated herein. The other contentions raised by defendant are found to be without merit. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Damiani and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered June 9, 1975, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and sentencing him to a term of imprisonment with a minimum of three years and six months and a maximum of seven years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a term of imprisonment with a minimum of two years and a maximum of four years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Upon the People’s representation that there was a promise made as to sentence, we find the sentence to be excessive to the extent indicated herein. The other contentions raised by defendant are found to be without merit. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Damiani and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 A.D.2d 853, 391 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kramer-nyappdiv-1977.