People v. Koon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Koon

275 A.D.2d 991

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1949

StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 991 (People v. Koon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Koon, 275 A.D.2d 991 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum: The indictment charges the defendant with having sold mortgaged property with intent to defraud the purchaser thereof in violation of section 940 of the Penal Law. The mortgagee’s representative testified on behalf of the People on direct examination: “ I had had a conversation with Mr. Koon here; I told him to sell the stuff and remit the money to us and he said he would.” We find no evidence in the record sufficient to support a finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant sold the property with an intent to defraud the purchaser. The judgment of conviction should therefore be reversed and the indictment dismissed. All concur. (The judgment convicts defendant of the crime of fraudulently disposing of mortgaged property.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: The indictment charges the defendant with having sold mortgaged property with intent to defraud the purchaser thereof in violation of section 940 of the Penal Law. The mortgagee’s representative testified on behalf of the People on direct examination: “ I had had a conversation with Mr. Koon here; I told him to sell the stuff and remit the money to us and he said he would.” We find no evidence in the record sufficient to support a finding beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant sold the property with an intent to defraud the purchaser. The judgment of conviction should therefore be reversed and the indictment dismissed. All concur. (The judgment convicts defendant of the crime of fraudulently disposing of mortgaged property.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Piper, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 A.D.2d 991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-koon-nyappdiv-1949.