Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Konoski

People v. Konoski

104 A.D.3d 958, 961 N.Y.S.2d 781
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 27, 2013
StatusPublished

This text of 104 A.D.3d 958 (People v. Konoski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Konoski, 104 A.D.3d 958, 961 N.Y.S.2d 781 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (R. Doyle, J.), imposed June 15, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was ineffective (see People v Grant, 83 AD3d 862, 862-863 [2011]; People v Bradshaw, 76 AD3d 566, 569 [2010], affd 18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011]; see also People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]). However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Leventhal, Austin and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Grant
83 A.D.3d 862 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 A.D.3d 958, 961 N.Y.S.2d 781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-konoski-nyappdiv-2013.