People v. Kom

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kom

120 Misc. 2d 630, 467 N.Y.S.2d 495, 1983 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3773

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJuly 8, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 120 Misc. 2d 630 (People v. Kom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kom, 120 Misc. 2d 630, 467 N.Y.S.2d 495, 1983 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Judgment of conviction unanimously modified, as a matter of law, by reducing the amount of restitution to $1,605 and, as so modified, affirmed.

The amount of restitution must be based upon findings of the sums actually due with appropriate allowances made for offsets or other factors which could properly reduce the total amount (People v Thigpen, 60 AD2d 860). In the instant case, taking into account the services actually received by the complainant, the amount of restitution should be modified as above indicated.

We have considered the other issues raised on appeal and find them to be without merit.

Geiler, J. P., DiPaola and Widlitz, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI