People v. Koehler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Koehler

31 A.D.3d 1213, 818 N.Y.S.2d 411

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 7, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.3d 1213 (People v. Koehler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Koehler, 31 A.D.3d 1213, 818 N.Y.S.2d 411 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), entered May 19, 2005. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant challenges only 10 points assessed against him under a certain category. Even in the absence of those 10 points, however, defendant’s total risk factor score nevertheless results in a presumptive risk level classification of level three, and defendant failed to establish his entitlement to a downward departure from the presumptive risk level (see People v Hamelinck, 23 AD3d 1060 [2005]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), entered May 19, 2005. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.), defendant challenges only 10 points assessed against him under a certain category. Even in the absence of those 10 points, however, defendant’s total risk factor score nevertheless results in a presumptive risk level classification of level three, and defendant failed to establish his entitlement to a downward departure from the presumptive risk level (see People v Hamelinck, 23 AD3d 1060 [2005]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.3d 1213, 818 N.Y.S.2d 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-koehler-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack