People v. Koberstein

206 A.D.2d 928, 616 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7870
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1994·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Oneida County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Because the record does not establish whether defendant was present at the Sandoval conference, we reserve decision and remit the matter to Oneida County Court for a reconstruction hearing to expand the record and to determine whether defendant was present (see, People v Michalek, 82 NY2d 906; People v Odiat, 82 NY2d 872; People v Mitchell, 189 AD2d 337). (Appeal from Judgment of Oneida County Court, Buckley, J.—Murder, 2nd Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Balio, Fallon, Wesley and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Koberstein, 206 A.D.2d 928, 616 N.Y.S.2d 297, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

206 A.D.2d 928 (People v. Koberstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Koberstein
216 A.D.2d 868 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. James
207 A.D.2d 1028 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)