People v. Knowlton

55 P. 141, 122 Cal. 357, 1898 Cal. LEXIS 585
California Supreme Court·Decided November 19, 1898·No. Crim. No. 472·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

GAROUTTE, J.

Defendant has been convicted of a felony and now appeals. He was prosecuted under section 332 of the Penal Code upon an information. The information is in the general form held sufficient in People v. Frigerio, 107 Cal. 152, and is clearly sufficient. The evidence also is ample to support the verdict. It is insisted that error was committed by the court in admitting certain declarations of the defendant before the jury which were claimed to have been made under menace and undue influence. It is sufficient to say that the declarations made in no sense amounted to a confession of guilt, and therefore any question of menace and undue influence does not arise.

For the foregoing reasons the judgment and order are affirmed.

Harrison, J., and Van Fleet, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Knowlton, 55 P. 141, 122 Cal. 357, 1898 Cal. LEXIS 585 (Cal. 1898).

55 P. 141 (People v. Knowlton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Domenighini
254 P. 292 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
People v. Kelly
231 P. 767 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)
People v. Peete
202 P. 51 (California Court of Appeal, 1921)
State v. Guie
186 P. 329 (Montana Supreme Court, 1919)
People v. Ford
143 P. 1075 (California Court of Appeal, 1914)
People v. Hutchings
97 P. 325 (California Court of Appeal, 1908)
People v. Willard
89 P. 124 (California Supreme Court, 1907)