People v. Knight

282 A.D.2d 760, 724 N.Y.S.2d 345, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4243
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 30, 2001·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (LaPera, J.), rendered April 2, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the [761]*761third degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion by permitting the prosecutor ,to cross-examine the defendant with respect to various prior convictions and their underlying facts (see, People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282; People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371). The mere fact that the prior convictions were similar in nature to the instant offense did not warrant their preclusion (see, People v Pavao, supra; People v Johnson, 249 AD2d 417).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, P. J., Florio, Schmidt and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Knight, 282 A.D.2d 760, 724 N.Y.S.2d 345, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4243 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

282 A.D.2d 760 (People v. Knight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Davis
299 A.D.2d 420 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)