People v. Knight

538 N.E.2d 353, 73 N.Y.2d 992, 540 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 397
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Knight. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 N.Y.2d 481
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 6, 1989·Published

Opinion

Appeal dismissed upon the ground that the Appellate Division’s determination of reversal was not on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal (CPL 450.90 [2] [a]). Although the Appellate Division stated that its reversal was on the law, it was based upon a claimed error which was not preserved and does not present a question of law for review by this court (People v Dercole, 52 NY2d 956).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judge Kaye.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Knight, 538 N.E.2d 353, 73 N.Y.2d 992, 540 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1989 N.Y. LEXIS 397 (N.Y. 1989).

538 N.E.2d 353 (People v. Knight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dercole
419 N.E.2d 869 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)