Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Kirzoncic

People v. Kirzoncic

112 A.D.3d 651, 975 N.Y.S.2d 890
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 4, 2013
StatusPublished

This text of 112 A.D.3d 651 (People v. Kirzoncic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kirzoncic, 112 A.D.3d 651, 975 N.Y.S.2d 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed July 18, 2013, on the ground that the amended sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the amended sentence is affirmed.

The amended sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Eng, EJ., Dillon, Balkin, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 A.D.3d 651, 975 N.Y.S.2d 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kirzoncic-nyappdiv-2013.