People v. Kirzoncic
112 A.D.3d 651, 975 N.Y.S.2d 890
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 4, 2013·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed July 18, 2013, on the ground that the amended sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the amended sentence is affirmed.
The amended sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Eng, EJ., Dillon, Balkin, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Kirzoncic, 112 A.D.3d 651, 975 N.Y.S.2d 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).
112 A.D.3d 651 (People v. Kirzoncic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kirzoncic v. The People of The State of New York
S.D. New York, 2019