People v. Kirkorov

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kirkorov

68 A.D.3d 1014, 889 N.Y.2d 862

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 2009·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9 [1989]). The defendant’s valid and unrestricted waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 256; People v Stewart, 66 AD3d 924 [2009]; People v Cenname, 66 AD3d 795 [2009]; People v Powell, 60 AD3d 974, 975 [2009]). Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 9 [1989]). The defendant’s valid and unrestricted waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 256; People v Stewart, 66 AD3d 924 [2009]; People v Cenname, 66 AD3d 795 [2009]; People v Powell, 60 AD3d 974, 975 [2009]). Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Lott and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

People v. Kirkorov, 68 A.D.3d 1014, 889 N.Y.2d 862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

68 A.D.3d 1014 (People v. Kirkorov) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related