People v. Kirby

1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 64
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedNovember 15, 1822
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 64 (People v. Kirby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kirby, 1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 64 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1822).

Opinion

By the Court.

“Mr, Meeks swears that he saw the 41 prisoner take the note complained of in the indictment; u he swears that he cannot be mistaken. In cases where there is doubt, character is essential, but where the charge u is proved, it cannot avail?

Hote.—Character formerly was only allowed to be given in evidence in capital cases : it was allowed only in favoreni vita ; but the rule has been extended to embrace all misdemeanors : vide the case of [66]*66Benjamin Harris, 32 Car. 2. J. Madder’s case,' Commis Oyer and Terminer, Dublin, December, 1799.

In the case of Green v. Cornwell, City-Hall Rec. vol. 1. p. 11. it is decided, “ when the feeling and reputation of an honest and upright citizen are involved, his good name will preponderate in favor of his innocence, in a doubtful case.”

In Freeland’s case, ibid, vol. 1. p. 82. it is decided, that “ good character 11 in a clear case of guilt will not avail a prisoner.” But it is also decided in the case of Levi James and others, ibid, page 132. that “ char- “ acter is sufficient to repel the presumption of guilt, in a prosecution “ for passing counterfeit bills, where the circumstances are slight on “ which the scienter is founded.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kirby-nyctcompl-1822.