People v. Kirby
This text of 715 N.W.2d 875 (People v. Kirby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Henry Dale KIRBY, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 6, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to remand for appointment of counsel and the motion to conduct an evidentiary hearing are also considered, and they are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
715 N.W.2d 875, 475 Mich. 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kirby-mich-2006.