People v. Kinslow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kinslow

80 A.D.2d 622, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10315

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 80 A.D.2d 622 (People v. Kinslow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kinslow, 80 A.D.2d 622, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10315 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered March 14, 1980, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the facts, by reversing the conviction of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree under the second count of the indictment, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Appellant’s conviction of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree under the second count of the indictment must be reversed. It was not established beyond a reasonable doubt that the [623]*623prescription presented to the pharmacy on May 8, 1978 had been forged. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered March 14, 1980, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the facts, by reversing the conviction of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree under the second count of the indictment, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. Appellant’s conviction of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree under the second count of the indictment must be reversed. It was not established beyond a reasonable doubt that the [623]*623prescription presented to the pharmacy on May 8, 1978 had been forged. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Gibbons and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.2d 622, 436 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kinslow-nyappdiv-1981.