People v. Kinley

35 A.D.3d 506, 824 N.Y.S.2d 720

This text of 35 A.D.3d 506 (People v. Kinley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Kinley, 35 A.D.3d 506, 824 N.Y.S.2d 720 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.), rendered June 23, 2004, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the issue of whether the evidence was legally sufficient to support a finding that he committed a reckless murder rather than an intentional one is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05; People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266 [2004]), and we decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]; [6] [a]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.E, Santucci, Lunn and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Payne
819 N.E.2d 634 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 A.D.3d 506, 824 N.Y.S.2d 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kinley-nyappdiv-2006.