People v. Kingston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Kingston

246 A.D.2d 316, 666 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 6, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D.2d 316 (People v. Kingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Kingston, 246 A.D.2d 316, 666 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven Barrett, J.), rendered February 1, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

A review of the record demonstrates that defendant’s plea was entered into knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily. The fact that defendant was not informed that his plea would result in eligibility for enhanced sentencing in the future does not affect the validity of his plea (People v Silvers, 163 AD2d 71). The record also establishes that the court clearly informed defendant of the possible consequences of a violation of the plea conditions. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven Barrett, J.), rendered February 1, 1996, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

A review of the record demonstrates that defendant’s plea was entered into knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily. The fact that defendant was not informed that his plea would result in eligibility for enhanced sentencing in the future does not affect the validity of his plea (People v Silvers, 163 AD2d 71). The record also establishes that the court clearly informed defendant of the possible consequences of a violation of the plea conditions. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Colabella, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D.2d 316, 666 N.Y.S.2d 416, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kingston-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack