People v. Kingston

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 456, 90 N.Y.S. 1108

Opinion

The evidence was ample to sustain the conviction; the sales were made in defendant’s presence, and with his knowledge. (Verona Central Cheese Co. v. Murtaugh, 50 N. Y. 319; People v. Utter, 44 Barb. 170; Cullinan v. Burkard, 86 N. Y. Supp. 1006.)

Judgment of conviction and order affirmed.

All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the trial court committed reversible error in refusing to permit three of the jurors to answer certain questions bearing upon their competency to sit as jurors, and also in overruling defendant’s challenge upon the ground of actual bias to the juror Hale.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Kingston, 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 456, 90 N.Y.S. 1108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 456 (People v. Kingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Verona Central Cheese Co. v. . Murtaugh
50 N.Y. 314 (New York Court of Appeals, 1872)
People v. Utter
44 Barb. 170 (New York Supreme Court, 1864)