People v. Kingston
This text of 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 456 (People v. Kingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence was ample to sustain the conviction; the sales were made in defendant’s presence, and with his knowledge. (Verona Central Cheese Co. v. Murtaugh, 50 N. Y. 319; People v. Utter, 44 Barb. 170; Cullinan v. Burkard, 86 N. Y. Supp. 1006.)
Judgment of conviction and order affirmed.
All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the trial court committed reversible error in refusing to permit three of the jurors to answer certain questions bearing upon their competency to sit as jurors, and also in overruling defendant’s challenge upon the ground of actual bias to the juror Hale.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Liquor Tax Rep. 456, 90 N.Y.S. 1108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-kingston-nyappdiv-1904.