People v. Kingsley
173 A.D. 985, 158 N.Y.S. 1125
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Kingsley. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 A.D. 320 →
Opinion
It was reversible error to receive, over the defendant’s objection, the evidence of Mrs. May that her sister, the complainant, after she discovered her pregnancy, two months after the alleged offense, stated to her that the defendant was responsible for her condition. (Baccio v. People, 41 N. Y. 265; People v. Clemons, 37 Hun, 580; People v. O'Sullivan, 104 N. Y. 481; People v. Friedman, 139 App. Div. 795.) Howard, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Kingsley, 173 A.D. 985, 158 N.Y.S. 1125 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
173 A.D. 985 (People v. Kingsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. . O'Sullivan
10 N.E. 880 (New York Court of Appeals, 1887)
Baccio v. . the People
41 N.Y. 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1869)
People v. Friedman
139 A.D. 795 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)